Subject: Re: scheduler woes on MPACPI kernel
To: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
From: Rhialto <rhialto@azenomei.knuffel.net>
List: current-users
Date: 01/18/2005 15:45:15
On Tue 18 Jan 2005 at 15:41:38 +0100, Lubomir Sedlacik wrote:
> not really, -20 is the highest priority, 20 is the lowest.  the manual
> page is pretty clear on the subject.

Yes, but "nice -20" is equivalent to "nice -n 20":

COMPATIBILITY
     The historic -increment option has been deprecated but is still supported
     in this implementation.

-Olaf.
-- 
                           -- Ceterum censeo "authored[1]" delendum esse.
___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- [1] Ugly English neologism[2].
\X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl   -- [2] For lawyers whose English/Latin is below par.