Subject: Re: getting x11
To: Nathan J. Williams <>
From: Greywolf <>
List: current-users
Date: 12/13/2004 15:36:32
[Thus spake Nathan J. Williams ("NJW: ") 6:16pm...]

NJW: You're making the mistake of assuming that that parameter is one that
NJW: is intended to be twiddled, rather than an implementation detail with
NJW: no particular guarantees attached.

If it weren't intended to be twiddled, I don't think it would have a
"=?" attached to it.  Maybe that's just my screwy logic jumping in
and making an assumption.

It's all just a matter of digging deeper, to me.  I should just shut
up and dig rather than asking questions.