Subject: Re: 2.0 and X 3.3.6
To: Ossi Herrala <oherrala@ee.oulu.fi>
From: Florian Stoehr <netbsd@wolfnode.de>
List: current-users
Date: 12/08/2004 13:22:53
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Ossi Herrala wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 01:58:33PM +0100, Florian Stoehr wrote:
>
>> But for some older machines, I need to make a NetBSD-2.0 that comes with X
>> 3.3.6.
>>
>> It it enough to swap the xsrc tree?
>>
>> (on 1.6, I used to install the x-sets from 1.5 - guess that's not
>> the "right" way ;-)
>>
>
>
> What happens if you set "USE_XF86_4=no" in /etc/mk.conf?
>
>
> I found this from src/share/mk/bsd.own.mk:
>
> #
> # Use XFree86 4.x as default version on:
> # i386, amd64, macppc, cats, sgimips, sparc, sparc64.
> #
> .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386" || ${MACHINE} == "amd64" || \
> ${MACHINE} == "macppc" || ${MACHINE} == "cats" || \
> ${MACHINE} == "sgimips" || \
> ${MACHINE} == "sparc" || ${MACHINE} == "sparc64"
> USE_XF86_4?= yes
> .endif
>
>
> --
> Ossi Herrala, OH8HUB
> PGP: 0x78CD0337 / D343 F9C4 C739 DFFF F619 6170 8D28 8189 78CD 0337
>
> Hi! I am a .signature virus. Copy me into your .signature to join in!
>
Hm, I'll have a look at this.
Is the xsrc tree able to produce a 3.3.6 (Hm ... is this possible? On
the other hand, several ports still use 3.3.6, so it should ??? How
strange...!) ?
Thanks
Florian