Subject: Re: wm0: wm_tx_offload: packet headers did not fit in first mbuf,
To: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@NetBSD.org>
From: Markus W Kilbinger <email@example.com>
Date: 12/02/2004 20:18:37
>>>>> "Bill" == Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@NetBSD.org> writes:
>> Though the machines is still accessible from one side (for
>> login e. g.), it no longer routes network packets ...
>> A kernel compiled from Nov 13th -current sources does not show
>> this misbehavior.
Some news: As Allen Briggs pointed out in a personal mail: Turning off
all the *4csum hardware features of these nics 'solved' the problem.
Bill> My undetstanding is that this change reflects cathing an
Bill> error condition that went undetected (and thus unreported)
Bill> before. So it's not that the kernel started misbehaving,
Bill> it's that it started telling you about issues.
Hmm, why did routing work before? Is the newly detected 'issue'
preventing a formerly (and falsely) functioning non misbehavior?