Subject: Copyright/trademark and the BSD daemon (was: Re: unofficial poll about new logo)
To: Richard Earnshaw <email@example.com>
From: Richard Rauch <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/01/2004 08:23:18
I have only ever heard a *copyright* claimed by Kirk. That only applies
to a *particular* instantiation (image). Please do not throw legal confusion
into the matter by pretending that we need to kow tow to Kirk when we
make a completely unrelated (but similar looking) daemon figure. He owns
the image, not the likeness.
Also, I thought that he specifically disavowed the "beastie" name, saying
that the guy whose image he holds under copyright never had a name.
These are just two correctional factoids for the thread.
"I probably don't know what I'm talking about." http://www.olib.org/~rkr/