Subject: Re: ata lost interrupts at probe time
To: enami tsugutomo <email@example.com>
From: Daniel Carosone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/29/2004 13:06:52
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 12:00:27PM +0900, enami tsugutomo wrote:
> `timeout' is also one of expected results in the code (relevant to
> recent change), isn't it?
Sure, and certainly its harmless and is doing the right thing as far
as probe results go. At the very least, it is disconcerting because
it *looks* like an error.
I'm not certain if "lost interrupt" is the same as "timeout" though.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----