Subject: Re: syspkg dependencies
To: None <>
From: Peter Seebach <>
List: current-users
Date: 10/19/2004 00:50:12
In message <>, Luke Mewburn writes:
>On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:35:42AM -0500, Peter Seebach wrote:
>  | On a related note, then:  Is there an easy way to build a -current system
>  | with no Kerberos code at all?  Apparently putting "KERBEROS=no" in
>  | /etc/mk.conf is not sufficient.

>Did you mean MKKERBEROS=no  ?

Hmm.  No; I did KERBEROS=no.

Okay, what the !*#@!* was I thinking?  I think it's the water.  There's gotta
be drugs in it.

I see!  I skimmed the "options which default to yes" and didn't notice the
MK part of the line.