Subject: Re: syspkg dependencies
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Peter Seebach <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/19/2004 00:50:12
In message <20041019054035.GD13602@mewburn.net>, Luke Mewburn writes:
>On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:35:42AM -0500, Peter Seebach wrote:
> | On a related note, then: Is there an easy way to build a -current system
> | with no Kerberos code at all? Apparently putting "KERBEROS=no" in
> | /etc/mk.conf is not sufficient.
>Did you mean MKKERBEROS=no ?
Hmm. No; I did KERBEROS=no.
Okay, what the !*#@!* was I thinking? I think it's the water. There's gotta
be drugs in it.
I see! I skimmed the "options which default to yes" and didn't notice the
MK part of the line.