Subject: Re: syspkg dependencies
To: None <>
From: David Young <>
List: current-users
Date: 10/19/2004 01:16:16
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:13:51AM -0500, Peter Seebach wrote:
> In message <>, David Young writes:
> >It is smaller than 32MB.  We did that without "breaking a sweat."
> >Much smaller is achievable.
> I would hope.
> In my case, I have the secondary issue that I'm actually doing my real
> development on the target system at first, so I want a "full" system... I'm
> mostly looking at trying to trim the size of a system by removing things
> like man pages, just to make it a little slimmer.

You can do MKMAN=no, IIRC....  I don't know, look at how we did it in
the script.

> >We are keen on running on very, very cheap, Flash ROM-limited systems
> >in the future.
> Ooh.  That sounds fun.  :)
> (Hey, that reminds me:  Anyone looked at trying to crack the massive NDA
> problems with the DiskOnChip people?)

M-Systems?  They don't have a massive NDA problem, do they?  I had
downloaded some of their datasheets to read, just the other day....


David Young             OJC Technologies      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933