Subject: Re: syspkg dependencies
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Peter Seebach <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/19/2004 01:13:51
In message <20041019061113.GM17288@che.ojctech.com>, David Young writes:
>It is smaller than 32MB. We did that without "breaking a sweat."
>Much smaller is achievable.
I would hope.
In my case, I have the secondary issue that I'm actually doing my real
development on the target system at first, so I want a "full" system... I'm
mostly looking at trying to trim the size of a system by removing things
like man pages, just to make it a little slimmer.
>We are keen on running on very, very cheap, Flash ROM-limited systems
>in the future.
Ooh. That sounds fun. :)
(Hey, that reminds me: Anyone looked at trying to crack the massive NDA
problems with the DiskOnChip people?)