Subject: Re: syspkg dependencies
To: None <>
From: Peter Seebach <>
List: current-users
Date: 10/19/2004 01:13:51
In message <>, David Young writes:
>It is smaller than 32MB.  We did that without "breaking a sweat."
>Much smaller is achievable.

I would hope.

In my case, I have the secondary issue that I'm actually doing my real
development on the target system at first, so I want a "full" system... I'm
mostly looking at trying to trim the size of a system by removing things
like man pages, just to make it a little slimmer.

>We are keen on running on very, very cheap, Flash ROM-limited systems
>in the future.

Ooh.  That sounds fun.  :)

(Hey, that reminds me:  Anyone looked at trying to crack the massive NDA
problems with the DiskOnChip people?)