Subject: Re: ipnat is broken in 2.0RC4
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Jari Kuittinen <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/19/2004 00:12:19
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 23:51, Martin Husemann wrote:
> I suppose "babe" ist 192.168.0.4, and these outputs were not done
Yes. babe is 192.168.0.4 and they were not done simultaneously. i didn't
have much time for tests since there is always need for working internet
connection behind nat.
> The pre-nated ports do not match - is there a matching
> connection in the ipnat -l output when you run the ping?
Yup. They match when i run it.
> Have you tried a "ping -n ..."?
No. Ping was just used as example to display that packets won't move