Subject: Re: ipnat is broken in 2.0RC4
To: None <>
From: Jari Kuittinen <>
List: current-users
Date: 10/19/2004 00:12:19
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 23:51, Martin Husemann wrote:
> I suppose "babe" ist, and these outputs were not done 
> simultaneously? 
Yes. babe is and they were not done simultaneously. i didn't
have much time for tests since there is always need for working internet
connection behind nat.

> The pre-nated ports do not match - is there a matching
> connection in the ipnat -l output when you run the ping?
Yup. They match when i run it.

> Have you tried a "ping -n ..."?
No. Ping was just used as example to display that packets won't move
through nat.