Subject: Re: com(4) and speeds >115200
To: None <fredb@NetBSD.org>
From: Daniel Carosone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/01/2004 10:17:37
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 02:32:35PM -0500, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> Try building a current kernel with options COM_16650 (COM16650 on 2.0).
Well, this is interesting. I saw that option in the sources, but my
eyes misled me to read it as 16550 and I just assumed it was on.
I didn't even know there was such a thing as a 16650.
And, indeed, with that option, the card probes as a st16650a
However, cu still doesn't accept -s >115200, nor does stty.
EINVAL from tcsetattr.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----