Subject: Re: Version Naming/Numbering
To: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
Date: 09/19/2004 20:48:15
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:52:15 -0400
From: email@example.com (Christos Zoulas)
| I am not particular to any of the first 2 [the third might not fit well,
| because the minor version is 2 hex digits in __NetBSD_Version__].
It is actually 2 decimal digits.
I don't care what scheme gets adopted, I was just trying to point out
that we already have 2.0G, and NV(2.0G) < NV(2.1) and that is not good
(or not unless we ensure that everything that has been included in 2.0G
gets included in 2.1, or discarded completely - without exception)