Subject: Re: Version Naming/Numbering
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
Date: 09/17/2004 23:38:40
In article <20040917210706.GE1281@netbsd.org>,
Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>I thought after the 2.0 release we were going to move current's version so
>that we didn't have this problem. I've forgotten what the exact fix was,
>but I know there are a few ideas floating around. I don't remember if it
>was we were going to 2.9 or 2.99 or we were going to 3F & friends and
>arranging it so that NV(3.0) > NV(3F).
That's what I thought too, and 2.99 was luke's proposal IIRC. Can't we just
agree on that and move forward?