Subject: Re: Bad response...
To: Johnny Billquist <bqt@Update.UU.SE>
From: Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com>
Date: 08/27/2004 21:07:10
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:59:19PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 04:49:36PM +0100, Aidan Kehoe wrote:
> >># Taken from Christan Biere's message 20031216002708.GA358@cyclonus
> >>I _think_ I was seeing the issues you are describing, and that these
> >>resolved it, but I honestly don't remember any more. Anyway, vm.filemax
> >>what you ask there, if I'm reading sysctl(3) correctly.
> >You also need to bump execmax and anonmax, otherwise some memory may still
> >be allocated to the data cache while the system is paging.
> Manuel, execmax and anonmax is in that list you quoted. :-)
Yes but he said "vm.filemax does what you ask there". changing vm.filemax only
> Anyhow, I've twisted all the vm.*min and vm.*max, and actually did get the
> response back into the system. But which parameter did it, or if it was a
> combination of them, I don't know.
Probably a combination of them.
Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference