Subject: Re: panic with named on -current (panic: looutput: no header mbuf)
To: Stefan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kr=FCger?= <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Steven M. Bellovin <email@example.com>
Date: 08/22/2004 23:40:52
In message <200408150640.i7F6eVBK000761@dsl-62-220-19-157.berlikomm.net>, "Stef
an =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kr=FCger?=" writes:
>In article <I2H3Gy.8M9@tac.nyc.ny.us> you wrote:
>> In article <20040815041322.E9F191AE99@berkshire.research.att.com>,
>> Steven M. Bellovin <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>I have not filed one, since I'm not able to verify or provide further
>>>information for a few weeks. But I doubt that it's only ipv6 that
>>>triggers this or we'd see a lot more people experiencing the problem.
>> You are probably right, but still a PR would be nice so that we can
>> keep track of the problem.
>Ok, I'll fill a pr.
>PS: Steven, my machine has a fxp0 NIC.
I'm now seeing this on 2.0beta, too. I'm going to file a separate PR
to help the release team track it. Since I'm fairly certain that the
faulty kernel has a different ipfilter version, I tend to suspect it.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb