--Signature=_Tue__27_Jul_2004_07_38_47_+0200_3DseleI0bP_bkNKS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:29:13 -0700
Soren Jacobsen <snj@pobox.com> wrote:

> I'd rather not see this go in.  If people need more features enabled in
> Postfix, I think they ought to use the pkgsrc package.  Having things in
> the base system depend on pkgsrc libraries makes me nervous.  Now that
> MKPOSTFIX=no works, people can build NetBSD without its version of
> Postfix.  Having (well, strictly speaking, it's unnecessary, but having
> them both installed at the same time would annoy me) to do this is no
> worse, in my mind, than building with your patch or something similar to
> it.

I agree, but I was asking about SSL support, because I think that postfix 
from the base system doesn't support this, If I'm not wrong, right?

BTW why postfix requires SASL libraries to enable SSL support?

Cheers.

--Signature=_Tue__27_Jul_2004_07_38_47_+0200_3DseleI0bP_bkNKS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFBBepnypkLYVDran0RAuZnAJ44JoKj9joZ8Hn6nAE1yj5MsYrCWgCghtnP
W3NiwZ/yBvRt6f5vAoH+UMg=
=wuG6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Tue__27_Jul_2004_07_38_47_+0200_3DseleI0bP_bkNKS--