Subject: Re: large FFSv2 -> file system corruption
To: David Brownlee <abs@NetBSD.org>
From: Pavel Cahyna <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/20/2004 23:24:39
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
> >A bit off-topic, but is there any reason for using UFS2 instead of FFSv1?
> Once point I've noticed: fsck is much faster.
> Handy on boxes with promiment power buttons :)
Yes, this can be useful especially in conjunction with the bug that
started this thread :-)