> Chris Ross wrote:
> > Peter Postma wrote:
> >> 2) Why was spamd(8) imported? It isn't really part of pf (it even works
> >>    without running pf). I think that this would be better to have in
> >>    pkgsrc (it's currently in wip/spamd).
> 
>    I didn't ever see an answer to this.  Why did spamd get imported
> to the core?  It's not really part of pf (despite being pf-aware),
> and IMHO should be in pkgsrc.  Where is wip/* ?

	it IS core part of PF.  see spamd(8) and see interaction between
	kernel PF and spamd on the userland.

itojun