On Tue, 18 May 2004, Manuel Bouyer wrote:

>On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:21:05PM -0500, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
>>
>> Does LFS work well enough for production use in 1.6.2?
>
>In 2.0 it looks OK (I use it for my /usr/src), but it may not in 1.6.2

I had some random corruption during the 1.6 -current series, which I
presume is down to it being in a permanent state of experimentation.

I'd say before even thinking about putting it into production, test that
it actually is faster for your needs than regular FFS. I found that using
bonnie at least, it was actually slower, especially on writes where LFS
was designed to excel.

My 2c, don't bother.

Christian

-- 
    /"\
    \ /    ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN - AGAINST HTML MAIL
     X                           - AGAINST MS ATTACHMENTS
    / \