Subject: Re: lkm versions
To: John Nemeth <jnemeth@victoria.tc.ca>
From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>
List: current-users
Date: 04/19/2004 21:49:29
--=-=-=


jnemeth@victoria.tc.ca (John Nemeth) writes:

>      Okay, that works, thanks.  It allowed the modules to be loaded.  I
> saw a note from somebody else that said that vmware crashes -current,
> and since the machine is busy compiling GNOME at the moment, I don't
> want to risk crashing it.  Is there anything in the modules that should
> be changed to make it work properly on a multi-processor system, or is
> that handled by the stuff with which it is linked?

Everything should work fine is locking is done properly. So yes, there
might need code changes needed for smp Those problems might not be
triggered in the uniprocessor configurations.

Love


--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUAQIQtTHW+NPVfDpmCAQLnQQf9GLbzYbTEB969ZzGUWynv5EijZqkdwpRV
vsV3720701+mCEcAgkT+G8eLY6dOSkvZTK6a/0A2WbQTuCG+gmdyahZXuUmwgbKP
OnS4DBiRhz2PIhMkEe8amkk7TDh9Ri0pIO7iRkV4d7rAMt7HgOZB77E/ODcGrJ1J
R5I7XBkMYkbWFj0AubUSofncyKVBlYOMmCYWnXUW8KdNSCy/MjnBCyZd0/uVFCC8
NGjvt+V6bBsjtVZU3WPR1F5krLsxfU4JPkQIpDUXhYbxupWAOTEtP2UPGc2FoApv
S6c6VcnCqm1MKPHeWIlpSoKqFcMDnx5Xz6Q9tGtgtw+T0aUWiXGiIw==
=n6iy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--