Subject: Re: PR's about which(1)
To: None <>
From: Christos Zoulas <>
List: current-users
Date: 04/01/2004 22:17:02
In article <c4i18u$h8l$>,
Michael van Elst <> wrote:
> (Christos Zoulas) writes:
>>This really proves my point :-) Solaris has one of the most antiquated
>Isn't it a POSIX requirement that most (but not all) shell builtin
>commands can be exec()'d ? Even things like 'umask' exist as
>commands in the PATH.

I think so.