--2KGcTUzwJ+J1jnia
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:58:26PM +0000, Dick Davies wrote:
> What's the overhead then? I'd guess 11Mbps / 8 =3D~ 1.5MBps - the rest is=
=20
> lost in collisions, is it?

My understanding was that the rest was lost in "overhead in the
protocol".

I think that's partially the RTS/CTS absurdity already described,
but a further part of it is ineffeciences in the layer 2
implementation of 802.11.

I could be completely wrong, of course. :^>

--=20
gabriel rosenkoetter
gr@eclipsed.net

--2KGcTUzwJ+J1jnia
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAQ9U89ehacAz5CRoRAt32AKCnlxrl9oHxB8+nlbRy+lPI1d/CtQCdEsUw
eOCLp2+rKggxyaG69adLmms=
=mpm+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2KGcTUzwJ+J1jnia--