Subject: Re: HAL (was build.sh fails)
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: gabriel rosenkoetter <email@example.com>
Date: 02/29/2004 19:01:44
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 01:49:41PM -0800, David S. wrote:
> OK, if 'sup' is broken, than why is it an "officially" supported
> method of retrieving -current sources?
Note that my calling sup "broken" isn't any sort of official
statement from TNF, considering I don't represent them.
That said, your message:
came after Manuel Boyer's message:
stating that sup is broken in that it doesn't distribute .o files
(his exact words: "I'll try to get this corrected"). Manuel's words
may be taken with a bit more force than mine.
Note also that not very many people seem to be having this problem
(though, it's probably open to question how many non-developers
are even capable of building at the moment, considering how bogged
anoncvs.netbsd.org, which just about everybody persists in using,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----