Subject: RE: Spam suggestion...
To: 'Peter Seebach' <email@example.com>
From: John Schieferle Uhlenbrock <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/22/2004 14:32:38
And a very large group of real people. This is not the way to go.
- John Schieferle Uhlenbrock
From: current-users-owner@NetBSD.org =
On Behalf Of Peter Seebach
Sent: Sonntag, 22. Februar 2004 14:22
Subject: Re: Spam suggestion...=20
In message <20040222131528.GK11328@phaeton.entropie.net>, Martin Weber
>I.e. lock out anyone with a private network who happened to name her=20
>machines as she liked, and didn't have the money to buy a global name?=20
>This sounds microsoftish :) (Or those who happened to name their=20
>private network, but were not quick enough to buy the domain, and thus=20
>their name is resolvable yet points to another IP, like in my case=20
No problem. HELO as your real address.
>Sorry, but this brutal scalpel method doesn't really help us.
Yes, it does. There is no sysadmin incapable of providing valid reverse
DNS, and this simple filter gets rid of a very large quantity of spam.