On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Klaus Klein wrote:

> On Monday 09 February 2004 20:42, Florian St=F6hr wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Klaus Klein wrote:
> > > On Monday 09 February 2004 13:00, Florian St=F6hr wrote:
> > > > Any compilation of ANY package related to X11 fails on 1.6.2_RC4 on
> > > > this platform. Still 2.95.3 on sgimips. Seems to have threadlib
> > > > problems (afaik no native threads on this platform). Linking with
> > > > pth-2.0.0 doesn't solve the problem.
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > Compiled it and got:
> > > >
> > > > root@sgi [/tmp/tt] # gcc -I/usr/X11R6/include -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX1=
1
> > > > tt.c /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined reference to
> > > > `__libc_cond_wait' [...]
> > >
> > > Are you possibly using a -current X11R6 snapshot in your otherwise
> > > 1.6-ish userland?
> > >
> > [...]
> > I used 1.6.2_RC4 from releng, and (also from releng)
> > /pub/NetBSD-daily/current/.xsets/sgimips.
>
> Well, "don't do that."
>
> > But since there are (?) no native threads on this platform,
> > could it really be that problem? Hm, I think the binary xsets from 1.6.=
1
> > of the platform should work then, I'll just give em a try.
>
> Sure there are, and your -current libX11 is aware of that, but the
> perceived "downside" is a dependency on a more recent libc than
> your threadstub-unaware 1.6.2_RC4 one is.  So, yes, the 1.6.1 sets
> ought to work for you, but if thread support is important to you
> you should consider going for -current with the whole system.
>
> > In general, I don't like those snapshots without the x sets and I'd lov=
e
> > to have also syssrc.tgz in the /sets folder. Anyone out there the same
> > opinion?
>
> Maybe you don't like it, but for now you'll have to cope with the
> former.  The in-tree build infrastructure of the netbsd-1-6 branch
> does not handle xsrc, which makes it infeasible to produce such
> sets.  I'm not aware of plans about having this pulled into 1.6, but
> those who know might speak up on that matter. :-)  As for the
> source sets, obtaining these via anoncvs seems more feasible
> at least to me, since the updates (after initially obtaining the
> trees) are incremental and thus reasonably cheap.  (Hint: the
> dates on the NetBSD-daily snapshots are for UTC, which makes
> checking out that particular set of sources straight-forward.)
>
>
> - Klaus
>

Yep, 1.6.1'X works. Thanks for the hint.

Florian