Subject: Re: tinkering with wi interfaces (Prism 2.5)
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Jeff Rizzo <email@example.com>
Date: 01/20/2004 20:20:44
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:54:28PM -0600, David Young wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:50:55PM -0800, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply, but a lot of this stuff is not only different
> > between netbsd and openbsd, but between older and newer versions of
> > netbsd. :)
> > (for example, there's no "ibss-master" option in netbsd)
> IBSS "masters" were a figment of somebody's imagination at Lucent
> or Intersil. There is no such thing in 802.11.
OK, that's fine then.
> > > On Tuesday 20 January 2004 03:31 pm, you wrote:
> > > > It may be that I'm just blind, so please strike gently with the
> > > > clue-by-four:
> > > >
> > > > I want to get these talking well in adhoc mode (because bridging doesn't
> > > > seem to work right with a wi interface in host mode), but I'd also
> I don't know host mode. Did you mean hostap mode? Bridging does work
> with hostap mode. It cannot work with the other modes.
By "host mode" I guess I meant "as a client of another AP". And I suspected
that there might be problems (mostly by the fact that it didn't work).
By contrast, it (bridging) *does* seem to work in adhoc mode. (which
is why I'm so keen to get things "working". (They *are* sort of
working, now... I was just hoping to be able to tweak various things
> If you enable debugging (ifconfig wi0 debug) then you should see
> wi_write_txrate: tx rate %d -> %d (%d)
> where the %d's are filled in to tell which rate the interface is
> changing to.
Ooh, I never thought to check out the 'debug' mode. Thanks!
> In general, `ifconfig wi0' cannot tell any single sensible media setting
> (for example, DS2 adhoc, DS11 adhoc) because there are many stations,
> each of which might have adapted to a different rate. This is one of the
> reasons that someday I intend to make virtual interfaces (sta0, sta1,
> ...) for all peers/clients.
> > > > Also, how do I control how the IBSS is set up? For example, I can't seem
> > > > to change what channel it uses unless I set *both* sides down, change
> > > > the channel on one, then bring it up first. (this could be a problem when
> > > > my only access to the far end is via the interface I just shut down)
> I know the problem you are talking about. I think that creating an IBSS
> on channel X when there is already an IBSS with the same SSID on channel
> Y is something that the Lucent & Prism firmwares do not want for us to do.
The main reason I'm using adhoc mode as opposed to putting one in hostap
mode and making the other a station is because of the bridging issue...
I *could* make one or both sides route, but in this case having
them as bridges just makes certain things much simpler. (at least
from one perpsective).
Thanks for your reply.
Jeff Rizzo http://boogers.sf.ca.us/~riz