Subject: Re: ffs compatibility added, fsck may complain
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/15/2004 15:02:51
> I've looked at the dumpfs output you sent me, and there is still a
> problem. I don't know why, but all of your alternate superblocks have
> been updated but the standard superblock is not. This could have
> happened if you used the -p flag or if you answered no to
> the UPDATE STANDARD SUPERBLOCK question. Alternately, I wonder
> if there is a missing ckfini() call somewhere in fsck_ffs.
i have answered "y" to UPDATE STANDARD SUPERBLOCK question.
> Hm. It would be useful for me to reproduce this case myself
> so I can take a close look at how the filesystem got in this state.
tnx. i can "dd" my filesystem and put it somewhere, if needed.