Thus spake Frederick Bruckman ("FB> ") sometime Today...

FB> From: Frederick Bruckman <fredb@immanent.net>
FB> To: Darrin B. Jewell <dbj@NetBSD.org>
FB> Cc: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@itojun.org>, perry@piermont.com,
FB>      current-users@NetBSD.org
FB> Subject: Re: ffs compatibility added, fsck may complain
FB> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:45:55 -0600 (CST)
FB> X-Spam-Level:
FB>
FB> On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Darrin B. Jewell wrote:
FB>
FB> That one didn't work for me, either. It claimed to, but apparently
FB> nothing was changed. I did "fsck -Tffs:-b32", and then "fsck -Tffs:-c4",
FB> and each seemed to work, as viewed by "dumpfs". I guess it's doing the
FB> "-c4" first, then overwriting its work with "-b32"?
FB>
FB> Frederick
FB>

Is there ANY way we can not mandate the -T ffs:fsopts format and just
attempt to pass thru the options to fsck_ffs?  If they work, they
work.  If they don't, they don't.  Having to type in all that crap
is an inflamed hemorrhoid.

Could we please make it so we can pass thru -b32 -c4 without -Tffs:...?
Or could we please make it so we can say -Tffs:option0,option1,option2...?

				--*greywolf;
--
22 Ways to Get Yourself Killed While Watching 'The Lord Of The Rings':

#19: Release a jar of daddy-long-legs into the theater during the
    Shelob scene.