Subject: Re: ffs compatibility added, fsck may complain
To: Darrin B. Jewell <dbj@NetBSD.org>
From: Frederick Bruckman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/14/2004 22:45:55
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Darrin B. Jewell wrote:
> email@example.com (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino) writes:
> > > firstname.lastname@example.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino) writes:
> > > > i see the following on dmesg (for / and /usr partition),
> > > > however, i do not see "VALUES IN SUPER BLOCK ..." message on
> > > > fsck_ffs -n -f. fsck_ffs -b 32 -c 4 had no effect.
> > > > how can i suppress the message? do i have to start over from scratch
> > > > (i.e. newfs)?
> > >
> > i can supply any info you would need, so just let me know what you need
> > to know about my filesystem.
> Ok. I don't understand why 'fsck_ffs -b 32 -c 4' didn't set the
> FS_FLAGS_UPDATED bit in fs_old_flags, which should cause the kernel
> to quiet the error.
That one didn't work for me, either. It claimed to, but apparently
nothing was changed. I did "fsck -Tffs:-b32", and then "fsck -Tffs:-c4",
and each seemed to work, as viewed by "dumpfs". I guess it's doing the
"-c4" first, then overwriting its work with "-b32"?