Subject: Re: ffs compatibility added, fsck may complain
To: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <email@example.com>
From: Darrin B. Jewell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/14/2004 23:31:01
email@example.com (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino) writes:
> > firstname.lastname@example.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino) writes:
> > > i see the following on dmesg (for / and /usr partition),
> > > however, i do not see "VALUES IN SUPER BLOCK ..." message on
> > > fsck_ffs -n -f. fsck_ffs -b 32 -c 4 had no effect.
> > > how can i suppress the message? do i have to start over from scratch
> > > (i.e. newfs)?
> i can supply any info you would need, so just let me know what you need
> to know about my filesystem.
Ok. I don't understand why 'fsck_ffs -b 32 -c 4' didn't set the
FS_FLAGS_UPDATED bit in fs_old_flags, which should cause the kernel
to quiet the error.
Can you please send me the output of a -current 'dumpfs -as' and
a transcript of running 'fsck_ffs -d -b 32 -c 4'
(The -d option just provides a little extra debugging information)
You can send it to me directly, there's no need to spam the full list
with diagnostics. I will send an update to the list about what I find.
Also, the dumpfs output should gzip well if it's long.