Subject: Re: current got 'swappier'/slower.
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: George Michaelson <email@example.com>
Date: 01/06/2004 09:48:26
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:42:57 -0500 Thor Lancelot Simon <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 09:27:54AM +1000, George Michaelson wrote:
> > I know this kind of non-specific whinge is (worse than) useless, but the new
> > mem alloc/kernel thing seems to suck. laptop user, current as of 2-3 days
> > ago. 256Mb memory.
> I don't know which change you think you're referring to, but I suspect that
> you mean PK's recent changes to the buffer cache code.
Yes. I think thats what I'm referring to.
> I just looked at that code again and I'm a bit curious about some aspects
> of it -- such as the use of, essentially, different LRUs for buffers
> of different sizes, which seems a bit bogus -- but I can't see how it
> could possibly cause additional demand for *pageable* memory, which is
> what would be necessary to cause an increase in swap utilization.
> I think some other recent change must be causing your problem.
Its bizarre. the apparent symptoms are: slowness re-painting X11 (eg screen
refresh from a virtual desktop re-position for mozilla, which is widget rich and
requires lots of discrete X callbacks to repaint) and a lot more disk noise than
usual, coupled to long stretches where interactive X response is slow, no window
repaints, no kbd/mouse input works, huge amounts of disk noise, and then a
splurge of activity. top/xosview don't show much I can detail. the reaper and
ioflush tasks in kernel are (to my eyes) unusually active.
In the past, NetBSD users with the luxury of more than one host have said X and
compile/disk don't sit well together, but for a single-instance user this mix is
Oh well. somebody with more clue than me will see this, and debug it better!
George Michaelson | APNIC
Email: email@example.com | PO Box 2131 Milton QLD 4064
Phone: +61 7 3858 3150 | Australia
Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 | http://www.apnic.net