Subject: Re: X distribution set names vs. installation script
To: Matthias Scheler <tron@zhadum.de>
From: John R. Shannon <john@johnrshannon.com>
List: current-users
Date: 12/29/2003 09:52:41
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

CURRENT - I  ran "cvs up -dPA" approximately 7 hours ago.

On Monday 29 December 2003 09:48 am, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> In article <200312290858.25979.john@johnrshannon.com>,
>
> 	"John R. Shannon" <john@johnrshannon.com> writes:
> > I noticed this AM that "build release" in xsrc prepares xbase4.tgz,
> > ... while the installation script expects xbase.tgz, ...
>
> With what sources? I've fixed that bug a long time before the 1.6 release
> unless somebody has reinvented it.
>
> 	Kind regards

=2D --=20

John R. Shannon
john@johnrshannon.com
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAj/wW9kACgkQOKbCxya4HYsXeACfaPMUBSmn4tzBkzyJ1MV+DKph
N1kAoJOadbPmXw7R2ktzbxPUdTGjv6lC
=3DX9T1
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----