Subject: Re: iconv bug (Re: micq on current ?)
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Gilbert Fernandes <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/26/2003 13:56:25
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 04:45:23PM +0300, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> ISTR, this is a bug in our iconv(3), that returns
> -1 (failure) when passed an empty string.
would it be bad (tm) to have our iconv(3) return
with sucess if passed an empty string, while
being given back the very same empty string ?