Subject: Re: BREAKING NEWS - "Offending Code" Specified (LinuxWorld)(Printview)
To: Greywolf <>
From: Jeremy C. Reed <>
List: current-users
Date: 12/23/2003 12:56:59
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Greywolf wrote:

> [I suspect that our similar files there were rewritten from scratch; the

It seems like SCO doesn't care about if rewritten, but the ABI of having
same values, like ENOMEM is 12 and so on.

> fact that they are present after the AT&T vs. UC ruling would indicate
> that they were NOT part of the Great Code Cleansing.]

Our sys/errno.h and sys/signal.h says:

 * (c) UNIX System Laboratories, Inc.
 * All or some portions of this file are derived from material licensed
 * to the University of California by American Telephone and Telegraph
 * Co. or Unix System Laboratories, Inc. and are reproduced herein with
 * the permission of UNIX System Laboratories, Inc.

I didn't look at others (stat.h, ctype.h, ioctls.h, ipc.h, acct.h,
a.out.h, ecoff.h)  yet.

   Jeremy C. Reed