Subject: Re: BREAKING NEWS - "Offending Code" Specified (LinuxWorld)(Printview)
To: Greywolf <email@example.com>
From: Jeremy C. Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/23/2003 12:56:59
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Greywolf wrote:
> [I suspect that our similar files there were rewritten from scratch; the
It seems like SCO doesn't care about if rewritten, but the ABI of having
same values, like ENOMEM is 12 and so on.
> fact that they are present after the AT&T vs. UC ruling would indicate
> that they were NOT part of the Great Code Cleansing.]
Our sys/errno.h and sys/signal.h says:
* (c) UNIX System Laboratories, Inc.
* All or some portions of this file are derived from material licensed
* to the University of California by American Telephone and Telegraph
* Co. or Unix System Laboratories, Inc. and are reproduced herein with
* the permission of UNIX System Laboratories, Inc.
I didn't look at others (stat.h, ctype.h, ioctls.h, ipc.h, acct.h,
a.out.h, ecoff.h) yet.
Jeremy C. Reed