Subject: Re: OpenOffice 1.1
To: Florence HENRY <Florence.Henry@obspm.fr>
From: Steven M. Bellovin <email@example.com>
Date: 12/07/2003 09:44:15
In message <Pine.NEB.firstname.lastname@example.org>, Florence HENRY
>On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
>> > I've read that the linux release of OpenOffice 1.1 was running well
>> > on
>> > -current (mine is 1.6ZD/i386) (see message :
>> > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2003/10/14/0005.html )
>> > So I downloaded the tarball on openoffice.org, and the installation
>> > went
>> > fine.
>> We use a Suse 7.3 base don't we? Wasn't 7.3 long before the days of
>maybe... So how did George Michaelson (the one who posted the message
>"Successful install of OpenOffice 1.1 release for linux") to make it run
>with a "functional Linux /emul, including java." ?
No idea, but it works for me, too, on 1.6.1 and -current.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb