Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/dist/bind
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Chuck Yerkes <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/02/2003 23:55:29
Quoting George Michaelson (email@example.com):
> > Returning to topic, sort of:
> > If a DNS server *requires* 4CPUs and 8GB of RAM to perform at blinding
> > speeds, or even if such a configuration is recommended for DNS, something
> > is very wrong.
> You do not need 4CPU/8Gb to run a root DNS server. So the counter-existence
> proof stands. (ISC run dual backed instances on single CPU, 1G memory boxes, for
> the F-root anycast cloud)
No, you don't need, generally. by the by, the AOL is, or was, as
far as I recall, the running the highest rate DNS servers.
My main point being that for $8k you can get a lot of machine.
BIND9 actually DOES take advantage of 4 processors on a well threaded
So lets add signed zones and requests and such and suddenly, having
a beefy machine is nice. Lots of RAM and the disks don't get hit
As for not having a monolithic partition? Best practices
covers that. My /usr is readonly. Quite happily.
Had a machine crash on a fairly busy server with a monopartition.
No freaking idea what all the lost+found files were. Chunks of the
OS behaving badly. With a 50MB / (rarely written and actually RO
on several machines), and /var/ (written to often) it would have
been less of a disaster. I'd expect lots of open /var files on
this system. Instead had 14GB of muck and a reinstall.