Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/dist/bind
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Chuck Yerkes <email@example.com>
Date: 12/02/2003 16:55:21
Quoting Rick Kelly (firstname.lastname@example.org):
> Chuck Yerkes said:
> >Me? I bailed on BIND 8 long ago and run BIND 9 in a chroot.
> >OpenBSD added some nice patches which do things like open /dev/null
> >and /dev/zero BEFORE chrooting so I don't really need much in
> >that env.
> Yup, I've been running BIND 9 for about two years now. I'm currently
> running BIND 9.2.3 on an SS5 running 1.5.4_ALPHA.
Which leaves me with "why is BIND 8 still part of NetBSD?"
Invalid reasons include "it's proven" (yes, and orphaned now too)
It's not longer supported; it's missing several Good Things. BIND 9
*is* slower (bind 4 is fastest, djdns is next, then BIND8 then BIND 9).
If you're not doing mail blasts or running AOL's DNS, you likely
don't care (and frankly, if you are, a 4CPU machine with 8GB of
RAM will perform better with BIND9 and still costs less than a week
of a really good consultant).