Subject: Re: Change to bridging? (was Re: IPF and ssh
To: Mark Nelson <email@example.com>
From: Daniel Carosone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/19/2003 16:18:04
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 01:13:11PM +0000, Mark Nelson wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Julian Coleman wrote:
> To be honest I don't think my machine is set up to bridge, what I have is
> 3 interfaces -
> ex0 - connection to the net
> ex1 - connection to the local lan
> ex2 - connection to the DMZ
Are you doing any NAT on the same machine? I presume it must be
happening somewhere if ex0 is to the internet. Please provide this
config as well, as it might be part of the problem.
> What I would expect to happen is for the packet from the remote machine
> (184.108.40.206) to arrive on interface ex0 and be passed out on ex2 to the
> machine connected to that switch. The machine that is running ssh is
> trying to connect to a destination port on the remote machine (ip address
No, it's replying to the original request, but for some reason not
obeying the keep state (or not matching it).
> is stopping it happening. I assumed that because I had a keep state on
> the original rule
> pass out quick on ex0 proto tcp from any to 220.127.116.11 port = ssh flags
> S/SA keep state
As recommended earlier, add "log first" to this rule, and also
monitor ipstate transitions with either ipmon or ipfstat -t
> that any connections back to the remote machine would be passed as this is
> I assumed would be an established connection, or have I got confused on
> how the keep state directive works.
No, this part is correct, but you might have a problem elsewhere
in your rulebase so you're not using what you think you're using.