Subject: Re: build.sh efficiency
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: William Allen Simpson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/07/2003 17:49:31
"Greg A. Woods" wrote:
> I think ultimately the real solution for this kind of problem in a
> project like NetBSD is to use a two-phase commit style of change
> management, but that a whole other world from the way things are done
> now. Here are examples of two SCM systems that support two-phase
Given the recent problems at Linux CVS, that sounds like a plan....
As posted to the tech-security list:
>On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:44:31AM -0500, Steve Bellovin wrote:
> The MSNBC story ( http://www.msnbc.com/news/990343.asp?0si=- )
> noted that there was a security problem in CVS.
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32