Subject: Re: checkflist error codes
To: Greywolf <greywolf@starwolf.com>
From: Frederick Bruckman <fredb@immanent.net>
List: current-users
Date: 11/05/2003 11:14:47
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Greywolf wrote:
> Example: I want to build a distribution with no /lib, /libexec or
> /rescue, and a statically-linked root. Or I might want to build a pure
> static distribution. Or I might want to build a distribution that uses
> compressed manual pages. Or I might want to build a distribution which
> will install nicely onto an embedded installation.
>
> But checkflist bites my knee when I do that. I find myself adding '-V
> MAKEFLAGS=-i' to the build process, something which, as even a
> lightweight-by-comparison developer/programmer, I *really* don't like
> doing.
The build could be a little smarter, and set ${NOPOSTINSTALL} if
various MK* options are set to "no". For yourself, can't you simply
set ${NOPOSTINSTALL}?
Frederick