Subject: Re: esoteric question: consistency of NetBSD CVS tree?
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Alan Barrett <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/16/2003 18:33:35
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, email@example.com wrote:
> Hey that's a good list of files. Thanks, I think you saved me the
> trouble of doing it myself.
Maybe not. The same problem might have afflicted additional files in
the intervening two years.
> Did you happen to notice the branch tags that were missing revisions,
> too? Many of the files in the repository have a pile of branch
> tags associated with them with (usually) vendor style revisions
> attached--but then no actual revisions in the RCS file itself.
No, I didn't notice that. Is it possible that the missing revisions are
for files affected by the Berkeley/AT&T/USL lawsuit several years ago?
--apb (Alan Barrett)