Subject: Re: Successful install of OpenOffice 1.1 release for linux
To: David Brownlee <abs@NetBSD.org>
From: Steven M. Bellovin <email@example.com>
Date: 10/16/2003 10:58:35
In message <20031015205203.D2D447B43@berkshire.research.att.com>, "Steven M. Be
>In message <Pine.NEB.firstname.lastname@example.org>, David Brownlee wr
>>On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, George Michaelson wrote:
>>> I just successfully installed the linux 1.1 release on i386 current, with a
>>> functional Linux /emul, including java.
>>> I think the port could be updated from 1.0.3 to 1.1.0 quite safely. I've cc
>>> the port maintainer accordingly.
>> Do you know if it works on 1.6.x? Last time I tried a 1.1beta
>> version it didn't like 1.6.1 - almost certainly requiring the
>> better linux emulation available in -current.
>I'm running it successfully on 1.6.x, x > 1. It didn't install for the
>multi-user configuration; I didn't bother figuring out why, since the
>machines concerned are all single user (i.e., me). Memory sizes range
>from (I think) 256M to 512M.
Hmm -- I just upgraded my -current machine to last night's sources
(1.6ZD), and OpenOffice no longer works on that machine. This is on a
256M machine. It displays a bunch of the usual
file_image_pagein: Function not implemented
messages, and then does nothing. But it's in some sort of loop; it's
taking up all available CPU time, according to 'top'.
UID PID PPID CPU PRI NI VSZ RSS WCHAN STAT TT TIME COMMAND
54047 15648 21820 36 64 0 452 12092 - R+ p7 1:17.81 /usr/home/smb/Open
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb