Subject: Re: Can LFS be trusted yet?
To: Konrad Neuwirth <konrad@mailathome.or.at>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
List: current-users
Date: 10/14/2003 13:33:03
--9/eUdp+dLtKXvemk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 01:14:25PM +0200, Konrad Neuwirth wrote:
> > Can LFS be trusted for a desktop / workstation workload yet? Also,
> > does anyone know if sysinst will support installing using LFS
> > filesystems in the next "real" release of NetBSD?
>=20
> I've had some serious issues with LFS partitions on two production
> machines; both of them started to panic if the partition filled up to
> over 90%. Unfortunately, I couldn't keep them up long enough for
> additional debugging information -- I had to get them up and working
> again, so they're now happily running FFS.=20
see also PR kern/9382.
regards,
--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org> --
-- <salo@silcnet.org> --
--9/eUdp+dLtKXvemk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQE/i97viwjDDlS8cmMRAjKfAJ0T7GOJSXVPkMBO9jHu60T78p10MACfSj5b
smjLuvhRpWLYpCcqiu6hUHY=
=wWAX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--9/eUdp+dLtKXvemk--