Subject: Re: recent 1-6 branch libc and mozilla (etc.)
To: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
From: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/11/2003 19:21:36
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:04:47AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 22:10:18 +0200
> From: Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com>
> Message-ID: <20031009201018.GA1098@antioche.eu.org>
> | What do the RFCs says for this ?
> | if dnscache is OK, we'll have to fix libc.
> I know that this has been fixed (in -current anyway, not in 1.6 yet
> I believe) but no-one actually answered this, so ...
> "OK" is not the right thing to ask. What dnscache is doing is legal,
> there's no requirement to send anything in the auth or additional sections
> when sending an answer.
> "OK" implies more of a value judgement, for which the answer is less clear.
Well, I meant "legal" :)
Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
NetBSD: 24 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference