Subject: Re: groff from today
To: None <>
From: Chris Gilbert <>
List: current-users
Date: 10/01/2003 09:52:56
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 00:35:18 -0600 (MDT)
Rick Kelly <> wrote:

> Andrew Brown said:
> >>div.o(.rodata+0x5f4): undefined reference to `__pure_virtual'
> >>div.o(.rodata+0x5f8): undefined reference to `__pure_virtual'
> >>div.o(.rodata+0x5fc): undefined reference to `__pure_virtual'
> >>div.o(.rodata+0x600): more undefined references to `__pure_virtual'
> >follow
> >you don't, by any chance, have half a build installed (ie, a build
> >that died before completing), do you?
> I don't believe so. Where does `__pure_virtual' come from?
> >i hit this about two weeks ago or so on my sparc.  i worked around it
> >by replacing the contents of /usr/include and /usr/lib with something
> >not quite so new.  the problem seems to be in or
> >thereabouts.
> I've now got 2 -current machines that won't build.
> 1. i386. Userland is from 1.6P era, around 3/2003, just before the SA
> stuff
>    went in. Groff configure thinks the c++ compiler doesn't work
> 2. i386. SMP. Successful build on 9/9/2003. Compile now dying in groff
>    due to `__pure_virtual'. 

Are these builds from clean? or an update?  Remember the c++ compiler
has changed (to 3.3.1) and this also changed the ABI.  perhaps you've
got a mix of old and new .o files?