Subject: Re: /etc/rc.d scripts and $PATH
To: Peter Seebach <seebs@plethora.net>
From: Greywolf <greywolf@starwolf.com>
List: current-users
Date: 09/15/2003 16:32:38
Thus spake Peter Seebach ("PS> ") sometime Today...

PS> From: Peter Seebach <seebs@plethora.net>
PS> To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <current-users@NetBSD.org>
PS> Subject: Re: /etc/rc.d scripts and $PATH
PS> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:28:56 -0500
PS> X-Spam-Level:
PS>
PS> In message <Pine.NEB.4.53.0309151407520.716@rivendell.starwolf.com>, Greywolf w
PS> rites:
PS> >More to the point, don't have commands with names which conflict with
PS> >utilities in the base system. :-)
PS>
PS> Yeah, well, I didn't.  Not my fault the system added a new command.

Sorry, I guess the smiley wasn't big enough.  No malice intended, -s.
Apologies.

				--*greywolf;
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology",
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.