On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 03:24:49AM +0200, Christian Limpach wrote:
> Why do we have SIZE_T_MAX at all?  Especially considering that SIZE_T_MAX 
> is the only _T_MAX we have:

UINT_MAX is the max for UINT. SIZE_T_MAX is the max for size_t. So historically
this seemed consistent.

Unfortunatley C99 disagrees with us and called the new max SIZE_MAX. So I guess
we should rename it now.

Martin