Subject: Re: SIZE_T_MAX Problem
To: Christian Limpach <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Martin Husemann <email@example.com>
Date: 08/18/2003 09:01:21
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 03:24:49AM +0200, Christian Limpach wrote:
> Why do we have SIZE_T_MAX at all? Especially considering that SIZE_T_MAX
> is the only _T_MAX we have:
UINT_MAX is the max for UINT. SIZE_T_MAX is the max for size_t. So historically
this seemed consistent.
Unfortunatley C99 disagrees with us and called the new max SIZE_MAX. So I guess
we should rename it now.