This is my late reply.

In message <20030611153301.2b31ad06.ggm@apnic.net>
	on Wed, 11 Jun 2003 15:33:01 +1000,
	George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 14:28:48 +0900 itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
> 
> > >> 	e_os.h is an internal header for openssl, and it is not for public
> > >> 	consumption.  if any code #includes it, the code is incorrect.
e_os2.h is public header?

> btw, openssl installations on Linux have e_os.h and e_os2.h both in the
> include/openssl install state. Therefore he may be doing this unawares.
It might be true.  Though applications including e_os.h isn't correct,
those coding is used in OSSL (security/ruby-openssl).  (I found that
it is broken on current a few days ago.)  But pre-release of newer
OSSL seems to be changed not to use e_os.h.

-- 
Takahiro Kambe <taca@back-street.net>