Subject: Re: Rototil of sysinst partitioning code
To: Greywolf <greywolf@starwolf.com>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@weird.com>
List: current-users
Date: 06/05/2003 15:39:03
[ On Thursday, June 5, 2003 at 12:15:16 (-0700), Greywolf wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Rototil of sysinst partitioning code
>
> I have my POV, you have yours, both at extreme ends of the scale.
The problem is you keep justifying your P.O.V. with baseless and/or
incorrect and/or disparaging arguments.
Whenever you give good technical arguments they don't apply to /usr
specifically -- and in fact they are usually arguments for including the
base /usr stuff on the root filesystem!
> But to put everything under / is not a bright move.
We agree on this 101%, but "this" != "putting /usr on root"!
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <g.a.woods@ieee.org>; <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>