I agree that it's not at the top of the list. :)

Nathan J. Williams wrote:

>Lennart Augustsson <lennart@augustsson.net> writes:
>
>  
>
>>Well, a 256k stack limit is a bug, IMO.  If I have set my stack limit to
>>a certain number I expect to have a stack of that size, not some random
>>number.
>>    
>>
>
>Yes, you're correct. I do expect to fix this bug someday, but it's not
>at the top of my priority list, and it involves some pretty
>fundamental changes to the way libpthread does things.
>
>        - Nathan
>
>  
>